We would predict matchmaking since the a moderate to help you materially transform this active as a regulation
. the latest punchline is the fact that general prominent limitation for women enjoys already been not the risk of interested in as well poor quality off a great spouse, but alternatively the risk of perhaps not settling for an adequate companion plus this ending up by yourself. \n
So by holding out longer and doing lots of online comparison shopping, all women can now obtain mates who are above average? What is this — the Lake Wobegon theory of female choice? \n », »children »:[<"id":160005314,"author":"Anon","vote_total":1,"user_vote":null,"updoots":1,"downboops":0,"vote_count":1,"date":"2019-11-16>
Yes, most women can obtain mates that are above average. It’s called polygyny. We already have a soft, informal version of this. A minority of men have a disproportionate number of serial marriages, relationships, and flings with women. But because of cultural inertia and a sense of shame, we pretend that this polygyny doesn’t exist and refuse to acknowledge that it’s based on women’s preference to share an above average man over exclusive access to a loser. \n », »children »:[<"id":160006165,"author":"Jonfraz","vote_total":0,"user_vote":null,"updoots":0,"downboops":0,"vote_count":0,"date":"2019-11-19>
Most young women. And even then, for many, only in the short term (research shows that when it comes to flings, one-night-stands, etc, men are less choosy and women moreso than when looking for a long-term mate). […]